·
Provides
building blocks for healthy neurons*
Phospholipid molecules
are key components of cellular membranes. The incorporation of these
molecules into membranes facilitates healthy cell function, toxin
removal and cellular signaling. One of the most important of these
compounds for neural cells is phosphatidylserine (PS), which makes up
about 10% of the composition of neuronal cell membranes.
Phosphatidylserine can be made by the body and is also taken into the
body as part of the diet. Some researchers believe that supplemental PS
may be highly indicated as we age, since our natural diets may contain
suboptimal amounts of phosphatidylserine.1 It is thought to
be especially important in maintaining the general structure and
function of the neuron. Supplemental phosphatidylserine may have
beneficial effects on memory function by allowing neurons in the neuron
networks to effectively communicate with one another.
Studies suggest that
phosphatidylserine enhances signal transmission between neural cells. An
in vitro study measured the effects of phosphatidylserine on
hippocampal (brain) slices taken from male albino rats.2 In
this study, the researchers found that when the brain slices were bathed
in PS, they had increased efficiency of nerve transmission and an
enhancement of long-term potentiation (which is related to information
storage in the brain) compared to control.
·
Supports healthy memory and thinking ability*
Animal Studies
Research has shown the
ability of phosphatidylserine to enhance mental function. Studies in
animals suggest that phosphatidylserine can positively impact learning
ability. In one such study, PS derived from soybean lecithin was
evaluated in mice for its effect on chemically-induced impaired
learning. The phosphatidylserine was given in the amount of 240, 360, or
480 mg/kg, and was able to significantly reverse the learning impairment
in mice.3 Another study evaluated the effects of bovine,
soybean, and egg-derived phosphatidylserine on behavioral tests in
middle-aged rats.4 Rats were treated daily with a dose of 15
mg/kg of phosphatidylserine, or placebo. The results showed that
phosphatidylserine from both bovine and soy was able to enhance mental
functioning in rats undergoing an active avoidance task (a laboratory
measure of learning ability). No effect was seen in the groups given
either the egg-derived phosphatidylserine or the control.
Another group of
researchers looked at the effectiveness of soy compared to bovine
phosphatidylserine in aged rats forced to perform a memory task known as
the Morris water-maze test, a standardized lab measure of spatial memory
function.5 The rats were fed soy derived phosphatidylserine
at 60 mg/kg for 60 days. This significantly enhanced performance of the
task by aged rats compared to control rats, indicating beneficial
effects on memory function. The results were similar with PS from bovine
cortex.
Scientists have
suggested that phosphatidylserine protects brain tissue by a novel
mechanism.6 A controlled study was done on rats where they
were given phosphatidylserine injections at three different points in
time. They were then injected with placebo or LPS (lipopolysaccharide),
a chemical agent known to have a negative effect on nerve transmission
in a specific area of rat brains (the hippocampus). Three hours later,
rats were assessed for their ability to retain long-term potentiation
(the long-term efficiency of nerve-to-nerve transmission, which is
thought to be involved in storing information in the brain). At the end
of the experiment, the hippocampal area of the rat brains was looked at.
Pretreatment with PS helped the animals overcome the effects of LPS and
support the health of brain tissue. The rats treated with
phosphatidylserine were also found to have higher levels of the
protective anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 than control animals. They
found that giving IL-10 also overcame the effects of LPS in a manner
similar to phosphatidylserine. Thus the group of researchers concluded
that one of the mechanisms of brain protection by phosphatidylserine may
be its ability to increase IL-10 production.
Human Clinical
Studies
A number of human
clinical studies have also been conducted using phosphatidylserine to
support healthy brain activity. In a review of the effects of
phosphatidylserine supplementation, the authors suggest that
phosphatidylserine may be effective at enhancing cognitive function and
supporting mild memory problems associated with aging based on the
results seen in both animal and human studies.7
One of the first
double-blind controlled studies on PS was published in 1986, and
consisted of 35 people with mild memory problems associated with aging
taking either 100mg of animal derived PS three times per day or
placebo. The subjects were analyzed with tests designed to assess
problems found in activities of daily life. They were tested after one
week and six weeks of taking the supplement, and then three weeks after
discontinuing. Although statistical significance was reached only in one
test (The Peri Scale, a measure of mood, cognitive function, behavior
and activities of daily living), the subjects taking the PS showed
positive trends towards improvement on all three tests compared to the
controls.8
A double-blind,
placebo-controlled study looked at 149 people supplementing with
phosphatidylserine over 6 months. The subjects were given 200mg of PS or
placebo orally for 3 months. Nine standard tests for brain function
were used to analyze the subjects before and after the treatment, and
then again at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months (after discontinuing the
treatment). They found that in the group most impacted by memory
problems associated with aging there was a benefit of PS on a number of
the cognitive tests performed, even up to 6 months after the
discontinuation of the supplement.9
In another study,
phosphatidylserine was given to 494 elderly patients who had mild memory
problems associated with aging. They were given 300 mg per day or
placebo for six months. The individuals were examined at the beginning
of the study, after three months of supplementation, and at six months.10
Using a standardized scale to assess changes in behavior and
cognitive function, they found statistically significant enhancement of
cognitive function in the group who took phosphatidylserine. There
didn’t appear to be any side effects associated with the use of
phosphatidylserine in this study.
A similar but shorter
placebo-controlled study again looked at the effectiveness of
phosphatidylserine in individuals with mild memory problems associated
with aging. It involved 163 patients who again took 100 mg
phosphatidylserine three times daily. They took the supplement for 12
weeks, and were evaluated every three weeks. The benefits they found
included enhancement of memory and name recall, learning, and ability to
concentrate compared to the control group. The subjects tolerated the
phosphatidylserine well and no side effects were reported.11
Yet another trial,
this one open-label (both the health provider and subjects were aware of
the supplement given) looked at phosphatidylserine derived from plant
sources on 15 people with mild memory problems associated with aging.
The study lasted for 12 weeks, and the participants were evaluated by
standard memory and learning tests 3 times (at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12
weeks). They were all given 100mg of PS, in PS enriched lecithin
capsules, three times per day. They found that the subjects performed
significantly better on most of the tests after supplementing with PS
compared to before supplementation, and 9 subjects reported improvement
of their memory in day to day tasks. Although this study was
open-label, the results fit in well with previous studies using
phosphatidylserine.12
·
Supports the body during mental and physical stress*
A number of small
studies have emerged that have shown positive effects of PS
supplementation on the stress response. The majority of the studies
have looked at the effects on stress induced from physical exertion,
although one study in 2001 looked at the effects on mental stress in 48
male university students. These students were given either 300mg of PS
or placebo for 30 days. Baseline and post-supplementation measurements
of mood, neuroticism and extroversion were assessed by questionnaire,
and vital signs were taken. After 30 days, the students were given a
standard acute stress test involving a difficult time-limited
mathematical calculation, and then measurements were taken a third
time. The sub-group of students who were rated more “neurotic”
experienced significantly less stress and better mood under the pressure
by taking PS compared to placebo.13
A further crossover
study of 8 healthy men looked at the effects of an acute dose of PS on
hormonal responses after physical stress. The men underwent physical
exercise between 8:30 and 9:30am after an overnight fast. They were
each tested 3 times in a crossover fashion with a one-week interval
between testing. Blood samples were taken before exercise, and were
followed by an intravenous injection of either placebo, 50 mg of PS, or
75 mg of PS. Subsequent blood samples were taken during and after
exercise. The secretion of both cortisol and ACTH (the pituitary
hormone that regulates cortisol) were significantly blunted after
exercise by supplementation with phosphatidylserine, as compared to
placebo. Other hormones, including norepinephrine, epinephrine, growth
hormone, and dopamine were not affected by phosphatidylserine
supplementation.14 The author showed a similar significant
response of oral PS on cortisol and ACTH after exercise stress in 9
healthy men. Subjects took 800 mg of phosphatidylserine or placebo
orally for 10 days in a double-blind, randomized cross-over study.15
In another
investigation, eleven fit male subjects with at least 4 years of weight
training experience were given 800mg of phosphatidylserine or placebo
for two weeks in a cross-over study.16 During this time they
were involved in eight intensive weight lifting sessions over the two
weeks. Although resting cortisol levels did not differ throughout the
training in the phosphatidylserine versus the placebo groups, the
post-exercise level of cortisol was significantly lower in the PS
group. ACTH was not affected by phosphatidylserine supplementation in
this study. The PS significantly enhanced the perception of well-being
and lowered ratings of muscle soreness in response to the severe
over-training they underwent during the study. The severity of the
training was confirmed by increases in creatine kinase (a measure of
damage to the muscles) in both groups.
|